Robotic-Assisted Nipple Sparing Mastectomy

Heather R. Burns; Jacob H. McCarter; Brody W. King; Jessie Z. Yu; Rosa F. Hwang

doi:10.1055/s-0043-1771047

Seminars in Plastic Surgery, Table of Contents

Semin Plast Surg 2023; 37(03): 176-183
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771047

Review Article

Robotic-Assisted Nipple Sparing Mastectomy

Heather R. Burns

¹Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

²Division of Plastic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas

,

Jacob H. McCarter

¹Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

²Division of Plastic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas

,

Brody W. King

¹Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

²Division of Plastic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas

,

Jessie Z. Yu

³Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

,

Rosa F. Hwang

⁴Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Minimally invasive approaches to breast surgery have evolved from endoscopic techniques to recent developments in robotic-assisted mastectomies. Initial studies on robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (RNSM) have shown improved patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcomes with similar complication rates and oncological outcomes in selected patients. This chapter reviews techniques used and available data on complications and clinical outcomes for RNSM. Currently, RNSM is an investigational technique in the United States and should be performed in clinical trials with U.S. Food & Drug Administration approval to rigorously evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this approach.

Keywords

robotic-surgical platforms - nipple-sparing mastectomy - robotic surgery

Full Text

References

References
1 Trayes KP, Cokenakes SEH. Breast cancer treatment. Am Fam Physician 2021; 104 (02) 171-178
2 Donnely E, Griffin MF, Butler PE. Robotic surgery: a novel approach for breast surgery and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (01) e2578
3 Freeman MD, Gopman JM, Salzberg CA. The evolution of mastectomy surgical technique: from mutilation to medicine. Gland Surg 2018; 7 (03) 308-315
4 Cancer Facts & Figures 2023| American Cancer Society. Accessed May 31, 2023 at: https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/2023-cancer-facts-figures.html
5 Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M. et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med 1981; 305 (01) 6-11
6 Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R. et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1985; 312 (11) 665-673
7 Lanitis S, Tekkis PP, Sgourakis G, Dimopoulos N, Al Mufti R, Hadjiminas DJ. Comparison of skin-sparing mastectomy versus non-skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Surg 2010; 251 (04) 632-639
8 Margenthaler JA, Gan C, Yan Y. et al. Oncologic safety and outcomes in patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 230 (04) 535-541
9 Toesca A, Invento A, Massari G. et al. Update on the feasibility and progress on robotic breast surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26 (10) 3046-3051
10 Kroll SS, Ames F, Singletary SE, Schusterman MA. The oncologic risks of skin preservation at mastectomy when combined with immediate reconstruction of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991; 172 (01) 17-20
11 Carlson GW, Bostwick III J, Styblo TM. et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Oncologic and reconstructive considerations. Ann Surg 1997; 225 (05) 570-575 , discussion 575–578
12 Bishop CC, Singh S, Nash AG. Mastectomy and breast reconstruction preserving the nipple. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990; 72 (02) 87-89
13 Satteson ES, Brown BJ, Nahabedian MY. Nipple-areolar complex reconstruction and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gland Surg 2017; 6 (01) 4-13
14 Bishop SN, Selber JC. Minimally invasive robotic breast reconstruction surgery. Gland Surg 2021; 10 (01) 469-478
15 De La Cruz L, Moody AM, Tappy EE, Blankenship SA, Hecht EM. Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, and nipple-areolar recurrence in the setting of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22 (10) 3241-3249
16 Wei CH, Scott AM, Price AN. et al. Psychosocial and sexual well-being following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction. Breast J 2016; 22 (01) 10-17
17 Jones C, Lancaster R. Evolution of operative technique for mastectomy. Surg Clin North Am 2018; 98 (04) 835-844
18 Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S. et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality?. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009; 118 (03) 623-633
19 Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins Jr DR, Karas T, Cohen BE. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (02) 457-463 , discussion 464–465
20 Sarfati B, Struk S, Leymarie N. et al. Robotic prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25 (09) 2579-2586
21 Struk S, Leymarie N, Honart JF. et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction by robotically harvested latissimus dorsi muscle in a single position: Cadaveric study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71 (05) 764-766
22 Hallbeck MS, Law KE, Lowndes BR. et al. Workload differentiates breast surgical procedures: NSM associated with higher workload demand than SSM. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27 (05) 1318-1326
23 Kopkash K, Novak K, Kuchta K. et al. The “Nipple Whipple”?! A pilot study to assess the ergonomic effects of nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26 (10) 3216-3223
24 Jackson RS, Sanders T, Park A. et al. Prospective study comparing surgeons' pain and fatigue associated with nipple-sparing versus skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24 (10) 3024-3031
25 Kitamura K, Ishida M, Inoue H, Kinoshita J, Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Early results of an endoscope-assisted subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction for breast cancer. Surgery 2002; 131 (1, Suppl): S324-S329
26 Ho WS, Ying SY, Chan ACW. Endoscopic-assisted subcutaneous mastectomy and axillary dissection with immediate mammary prosthesis reconstruction for early breast cancer. Surg Endosc 2002; 16 (02) 302-306
27 Shin H. Current trends in and indications for endoscopy-assisted breast surgery for breast cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol 2021; 1187: 567-590
28 Lai HW, Chen ST, Chen DR. et al. Current trends in and indications for endoscopy-assisted breast surgery for breast cancer: results from a six-year study conducted by the Taiwan Endoscopic Breast Surgery Cooperative Group. PLoS One 2016; 11 (03) e0150310
29 Sawai K, Nakajima H, Mizuta N, Sakaguchi K, Hachimine Y. [Progress in endoscopic surgery for breast cancer]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2005; 32 (09) 1240-1243
30 Leff DR, Vashisht R, Yongue G, Keshtgar M, Yang GZ, Darzi A. Endoscopic breast surgery: where are we now and what might the future hold for video-assisted breast surgery?. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 125 (03) 607-625
31 Soybir G, Fukuma E. Endoscopy assisted oncoplastic breast surgery (EAOBS). J Breast Health 2015; 11 (02) 52-58
32 Lai HW, Wu HS, Chuang KL. et al. Endoscopy-assisted total mastectomy followed by immediate pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstruction: preliminary results of 48 patients. Surg Innov 2015; 22 (04) 382-389
33 Wang Y, Wu JX, Guan S. A technique of endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer. JSLS 2017; 21 (02) e2017
34 Lai HW, Lin SL, Chen ST. et al. Single-axillary-incision endoscopic-assisted hybrid technique for nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique, preliminary results, and patient-reported cosmetic outcome from preliminary 50 procedures. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25 (05) 1340-1349
35 Tukenmez M, Ozden BC, Agcaoglu O. et al. Videoendoscopic single-port nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2014; 24 (02) 77-82
36 Wang ZH, Gao GX, Liu WH. et al. Single-port nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction for breast cancer. Surg Endosc 2023; 37 (05) 3842-3851
37 Toesca A, Peradze N, Galimberti V. et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant: first report of surgical technique. Ann Surg 2017; 266 (02) e28-e30
38 Lai HW, Chen ST, Tai CM. et al. Robotic- versus endoscopic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction in the management of breast cancer: a case-control comparison study with analysis of clinical outcomes, learning curve, patient-reported aesthetic results, and medical cost. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27 (07) 2255-2268
39 Ahn SJ, Song SY, Park HS. et al. Early experiences with robot-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 2019; 46 (01) 79-83
40 Jeon DN, Kim J, Ko BS. et al. Robot-assisted breast reconstruction using the prepectoral anterior tenting method. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (11) 2906-2915
41 Sarfati B, Honart JF, Leymarie N, Kolb F, Rimareix F. Robotic-assisted Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: a feasibility study on cadaveric models. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (11) 1571-1572
42 Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A. et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: feasibility and safety study. Breast 2017; 31: 51-56
43 Park HS, Lee J, Lai HW. et al. Surgical and oncologic outcomes of robotic and conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction: International Multicenter Pooled Data Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29 (11) 6646-6657
44 Hwang RF, Hunt KK. The emergence of robotic-assisted breast surgery: proceed with caution. Ann Surg 2020; 271 (06) 1013-1015
45 Lai HW, Chen ST, Lin SL. et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with gel implant: technique, preliminary results and patient-reported cosmetic outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26 (01) 42-52
46 Rajappa SK, Kumar R, Garg S, Ram D. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy: the first experience from Indian subcontinent. Breast J 2018; 24 (06) 1114-1115
47 Houvenaeghel G, Bannier M, Rua S. et al. Breast cancer robotic nipple sparing mastectomy: evaluation of several surgical procedures and learning curve. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17 (01) 27
48 Angarita FA, Castelo M, Englesakis M, McCready DR, Cil TD. Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy: systematic review. Br J Surg 2020; 107 (12) 1580-1594 (British Journal of Surgery)
49 Sarfati B, Honart JF, Leymarie N, Rimareix F, Al Khashnam H, Kolb F. Robotic da Vinci Xi-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy: first clinical report. Breast J 2018; 24 (03) 373-376
50 Lai HW, Toesca A, Sarfati B. et al. Consensus statement on robotic mastectomy-expert panel from International Endoscopic and Robotic Breast Surgery Symposium (IERBS) 2019. Ann Surg 2020; 271 (06) 1005-1012
51 Lai HW, Lin SL, Chen ST. et al. Robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with robotic latissimus dorsi flap harvest - Technique and preliminary results. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71 (10) e59-e61
52 Selber JC, Baumann DP, Holsinger FC. Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (06) 1305-1312
53 Clemens MW, Kronowitz S, Selber JC. Robotic-assisted latissimus dorsi harvest in delayed-immediate breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2014; 28 (01) 20-25
54 Chung JH, You HJ, Kim HS, Lee BI, Park SH, Yoon ES. A novel technique for robot assisted latissimus dorsi flap harvest. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (07) 966-972
55 Houvenaeghel G, Barrou J, Jauffret C. et al. Robotic versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 637049
56 Moon J, Lee J, Lee DW. et al. Postoperative pain assessment of robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prepectoral prosthesis breast reconstruction: a comparison with conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy. Int J Med Sci 2021; 18 (11) 2409-2416
57 Loh ZJ, Wu TY, Cheng FTF. Evaluation of the learning curve in robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 21 (03) e279-e284
58 Toesca A, Sangalli C, Maisonneuve P. et al. A randomized trial of robotic mastectomy versus open surgery in women with breast cancer or BrCA mutation. Ann Surg 2022; 276 (01) 11-19
59 Clavien PA, Strasberg SM. Severity grading of surgical complications. Ann Surg 2009; 250 (02) 197-198
60 Lai HW, Chen DR, Liu LC. et al. Robotic versus conventional or endoscopic assisted nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate prothesis breast reconstruction in the management of breast cancer- a prospectively designed multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes, medical cost, and patient-reported-outcomes (RCENSM-P). Ann Surg 2023; (e-pub ahead of publication)
61 Park KU, Lee S, Sarna A. et al. Prospective pilot study protocol evaluating the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (RNSM). BMJ Open 2021; 11 (11) e050173
62 Health C for D and R. UPDATE. Caution with Robotically-Assisted Surgical Devices in Mastectomy: FDA Safety Communication. FDA. Published online August 20, 2021. Accessed May 7, 2023, at: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/update-caution-robotically-assisted-surgical-devices-mastectomy-fda-safety-communication
63 Sheetz KH, Dimick JB. Is it time for safeguards in the adoption of robotic surgery?. JAMA 2019; 321 (20) 1971-1972
64 Melamed A, Margul DJ, Chen L. et al. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 379 (20) 1905-1914